I
think if I have any real talent at all in life, it probably lies in my ability
to misinterpret lofty ideas in such a way that when I try and recall them later
they don't resemble the original concept in any way, shape or form.
One
such concept I may have totally misconstrued is the concept of 'Platonic
Ideals', which, as far as I can recall, involves the theory that there exists
in the world of ideals a 'perfect' template for everything in existence, which
includes objects like chairs, tables, and plants. Probably the best way to
illustrate it is when you consider a circle. No perfect circle exists in the
real world - but it does in the world of Platonic Ideals.
When
I apply this theory to people, I find myself coming to a disturbing conclusion
- young people do know everything!
I
know this is hard to swallow, but when I consider the most wide-eyed,
optimistic and morally righteous version of myself, it probably existed around
the age of 18. At this age the Platonic Ideal I constructed for myself would have
consisted of some free-lovin', cosmic, bohemian beatnik-type sitting in coffee
houses writing intense poetry and being talked about in hushed tones of
admiration by other patrons.
Of
course, this scenario is for an ideal world. I find trouble usually
arises when trying to apply utopian fantasies to the everyday. The real world
bohemian Trevor's poetry would most likely be terrible, the other patrons would
consider me a poser rather than a delicate genius and the baristas would most
likely spit in my coffee.
The
problem with having a vision for a perfect world and a perfect version of
yourself is that the rest of the seven billion people on the planet also have
their own ideas of perfection. When these other ideas clash with your own
Platonic Ideal, then you're forced to deal with the most adult and mundane of
realities - the dreaded 'compromise'.
I
went to university in my late twenties and as an older student who had lived a
bit, I often found the degree of passion on both sides of student politics to
be amusing. Being passionate on campus is one thing, but I often wonder how
these embryonic politicians fared after university trying to sell their ideas
to a marketplace full of self-centred and often ill-informed citizens. Did they
have to compromise their core beliefs in order to survive in the world of
politics? Sadly, I think the answer is probably 'yes'.
Winston
Churchill once said "If you're young and a Conservative you don't
have a heart, and if you're old and a Liberal you don't have a brain." I
don't necessarily agree with this, but I know what he was getting at. People
probably do get a little bit more cautious as they get older and being young is
the only time you really have to outwardly challenge the status quo.
The
thought of anybody ever referring to me as being conservative still fills me
with dread, but I don't really think the answer to anything lies in the
absolute extremes. A younger version of myself probably did. One of the best
illustrations of taking your beliefs to an absolute extreme that I found
poignant was in the show 'Six Feet Under' where Nate's hippie girlfriend Lisa
tried to shoo ants out of her house rather than have to kill them. To me this
seems like taking your beliefs too far. Maybe for some people it isn't.
I
suppose the best use in life for the Platonic Ideal of your younger self is as
an anchor - something to return to and measure yourself by when life doesn't
turn out like you imagined. Maybe someone you once loved marries someone else,
or you're forced to settle for a job just to pay the bills rather than indulge
your passions. It's important to remember that although the younger version of
yourself may have been the purer form - it was only that way because it had
never been tested against the real world.
Probably
a lot of people don't like the younger versions of themselves anymore, but bad
hairstyles and fashion sense aside, they still were once you and therefore
shouldn't be dismissed.
I
think if I visited the bohemian-beatnik version of myself in the world of
ideals, I wouldn't have any harsh words to say to him. I would, however, wait
for him to go to the bathroom and then go and spit in his coffee. It would give
me a sense of satisfaction to dilute some of his smugness and ultimately he
wouldn't know any better.
At
the end of the day if anybody is going to spit in my coffee, I'd want it to be
me.